Suggested Strategies and Resources: Personal Context
Instruction builds upon background information, interest, and experience.
Research suggests that building upon students' background information, interest, and experience is not only key to engaging reluctant readers and writers; it is also key to helping weak readers make connections to the text which they may not make on their own. This is especially important for English language learners.
For strategies on how to activate background knowledge, see
http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9219/prior.htm.
The Internet is one resource that can provide materials that connect to students' lives and/or inspire an interest in the topic at hand. For a
discussion of how hypertext can support content-area, student-centered learning, see http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/mceneaney/index.html
Top
Suggested Strategies and Resources: Facilitation of Discussion
Teachers facilitate rather than "lead" discussions.
Skillful facilitation of discussions is an effective way to generate critical thinking, involve students in their learning,
scaffold individual assignments, and assess comprehension. A classroom that is structured to welcome and respect different opinions and perspectives can become a truly supportive learning community. Note that this is very different from the teacher-led, question-and-answer sessions
that more typically occur in secondary classrooms.
For a description of classroom strategies that are effective for encouraging classroom discussion with both ELLS and native speakers, see http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/directions/12.htm.
Top
Suggested Strategies and Resources: Varied Groupings
Teachers use varied groupings.
Fluid and varied groupings are structural keys to meeting the needs of diverse learners. Such groupings also make possible the variety of learning experiences and practices that are effective in supporting literacy development. A mix of whole group, small group, paired, and individual work activities throughout the week is necessary because students are multi-faceted as learners and because literacy development is complex.
Teachers can change grouping strategies to match the needs of learners and the objectives of different tasks. This allows for a variety of working arrangements over the course of each week. Different configurations that allow for heterogeneous and homogeneous groups can give teachers ample time to interact with those needing additional support and to incorporate structured and unstructured literacy development (reading, writing, speaking, listening).
Top
Questions to Think About
Before you can implement this Key Component, your stakeholders will need to consider some or all of these questions. The questions could be used in group discussions, needs sensing activities, and informal small-group conversations.
- Which of the above best practices typically occur now as part of teaching and learning? Which do not? Why do you think that is the
case?
-
How would teaching and learning shift if the above best practices characterized education throughout the school? How would you use time, space,
personnel, and materials/resources differently?
-
What kind of support would teachers need in order to effectively incorporate these practices into teaching and learning on a daily
basis?
-
If these practices were to characterize what takes place in classrooms throughout the school, would any current instructional benefits be displaced or compromised?
Top