In the Spotlight The Knowledge Loom Home Page About Search Feedback Site Map Partners
The Knowledge Loom - Redesigning High SchoolsSpotlight cover page

Spotlight Cover

List of Practices

about this practice

What is it?

Stories

Current page

Research

Policy

Related Resources

Join the dialog submenus

Panel Discussion

Have Your Say

Q & A

Download/Print

Entire Spotlight

This Practice

Selections


About Printing

Log in
Register



THE PRACTICE:

Fostering Independent Learning
Students learn to design pathways toward their own futures through personalized learning plans, an advisory system, and student-led conferences. These and other strategies help them to identify and achieve personal and educational goals.


Content Presented By:
The Education Alliance at Brown University content provider logo
National Association of Secondary School Principals content provider logo

Research

  1. Research Summary for Fostering Independent Learning
  2. General Research Summary for Redesigning High Schools
  3. Annotated References for Fostering Independent Learning
  4. Additional References for Fostering Independent Learning
  5. General References for Redesigning High Schools

I. Research Summary for Fostering Independent Learning

Real-world experiences empower and inspire students to take control of their own learning. Small learning communities can create the conditions to allow for the use of personal learning plans (PLPs), student-led conferences, project-based learning, service learning, and other innovative strategies to promote active student engagement in education (Clarke 2000).

Alternative forms of assessment can be used to gauge what a student knows and is able to do. Using student exhibitions and portfolios is a powerful alternative to using standardized testing to identify students' depth of knowledge in a subject area (Cushman Brandjes 2003; Levine 2002).

Experiential learning programs like Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound provide students with the opportunity to test their physical limits by learning skills like team building and self-reliance, while continuing academic growth in literacy, science, and math (NSDC 2000). Soliciting student input in formal meetings or informal conversations can provide the school with a picture of students' needs and interests. It can also help staff to design coursework around those needs and interests (Park & Smith 2003).

[top]

II. General Research Summary for Redesigning High Schools

The research on redesigning high schools is about both size and quality. The discussion about size focuses on the various ways to reorganize large schools into smaller learning communities and the persuasive findings that smaller can be better in terms of student performance and engagement in learning. The discussion about quality refers to improving the teaching and learning environments so that they are also more student-centered, more individually relevant and rigorous in content, and more versatile/effective with respect to teaching strategies.

Most studies of high school redesign look at "best practices" in concert and as elements of unified and systemic change. In a 1999 New American High Schools publication, Key High School Reform Strategies: An Overview of Research Findings, authors Visher, Emanuel, and Teitelbaum listed ten reform strategies with two warnings:

First,...none of the strategies by themselves should be expected to make a significant difference in any one school. That is, the available evidence suggests that it is the gathering of several strategies under one roof, especially certain combinations of strategies, that matters . . . Second, schools should adapt strategies to fit their own unique circumstances. Unfortunately, there is no single, correct way to implement reforms . . . (p. 2).

Having identified the essential elements of reform, researchers have since turned to focusing on the barriers to improvement that schools have encountered. All Over the Map addresses what states can do to help. New Small Learning Communities: Findings from recent literature looks at numerous barriers and their roots.

Researchers also continue to probe the interplay of reform elements with other factors such as individual school cultures, teacher and administrator capacity, and racial and economic inequities. Research About School Size and School Performance in Impoverished Communities by Craig Howley, Marty Strange, and Robert Bickel (ERIC Digest, 2000) reviews the findings of the Matthew Project, a multi-state study that replicated findings showing that small schools significantly reduce the achievement gap for low-income students. All else equal, larger school size benefits achievement in affluent communities, but it is detrimental in impoverished communities (Howley & Bickel, 1999). Even in affluent communities, however, schools serving 1,500 or more students might have diseconomies of scale and bureaucratic operating modes that are not educationally hospitable. Indeed, a wide consensus seems to have emerged (cf. Fulton, 1996) that schools larger than 1,000 are unwise choices for any community. The consensus clearly suggests that schools in impoverished communities should be much, much smaller.

[top]

III. Annotated References for Fostering Independent Learning

DiMartino, J., Clarke, J., and Wolk, D. editors (2003). Personalized Learning: Preparing High School Students to Create Their Futures. ScarecrowPress, Lanham, MD.

This book, written by 23 education practitioners, administrators and policy-makers highlights current initiatives aimed at personalizing learning for high school students. Personal Learning Plans that tie the learning to the talents and aspirations of the student are described. Classroom teaching that allows individuals to gain knowledge while pursuing their own hops is explored. Sections describe high school designs that engage students in democratic processes and systemic changes that must accompany and support personalized learning for all students. Written by practitioners with practical interest in moving high schools toward personalization, this book will excite others to initiate reforms that enable ALL young adult learners to meet common standards while designing and pursuing a unique pathway toward adult roles.

 

Jenkins, J.M. & Keefe, J.W. (2002, February). Two schools: Two approaches to personalized learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(6), 449-456. Copyright 2002 Phi Delta Kappa International.

The authors believe that the kind of vital personalization exemplified at Haney and Parker-not state testing or rigid standardization-must become the cornerstone of school renewal if educators and the communities they serve hope to change, in any significant way, the basic grammar of schooling.

 

Nagel, J.E. & Smith, P. (2001, November). The art of personalizing learning. Principal Leadership, 2(3), 36-39.

Creativity is often reserved for the traditional arts, but personalized learning is an art of its own.

[top]

 

IV. Additional References for Fostering Independent Learning

Clarke, J. (2000) Dynamics of Change in High School Teaching. A Study of Innovation in five Vermont professional development schools.

Cohen, E. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cohen, E. and Lotan, R. A., eds. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: sociological theory in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cushman Brandjes, E. Assessing to Engage: Developing Personal Profiles for Each Student. Chapter 2 in DiMartino, J., Clarke, J., and Wolk, D. editors (2003). Personalized Learning: Preparing High School Students to Create Their Futures. Lanham, MD: ScarecrowPress.

Darling Hammond, L., Snyder, J., Ancess, J., Einbender, L., Goodwin, A. L., & Macdonald, M. B. (1993). Creating learner-centered accountability. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Dixon-Krauss, L. (1996). Vygotsky in the Classroom: Mediated literacy instruction and assessment. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Levine, E. (2001) One Kid at a Time: Big Lessons from a Small School. New York: Teachers College Press.

Park J. and Smith P. (February, 2003) Turn Up the Volume. Principal Leadership 37-40.

Wehlage, G. G., Rutter, R. A., and Tumbaugh, A. (1987, March). A program model for at-risk high school students. Educational Leadership 45: 70ú73.

[top]

V. General References for Redesigning High Schools

Breaking Ranks in Action
http://www.principals.org/publicaffairs/pr_br_action040202.htm

New Report Tracks Progress of Groundbreaking Research
http://www.principals.org/schoolimprove/breakingranks_2002.html
An analysis of the most current research and findings surrounding the recommendations in Breaking Ranks: Changing an American Institution, provides a synopsis of the literature underpinning the more than 80 recommendations in the original Breaking Ranksreport.

School Redesign Network at Stanford University Internet Resources on Starting Small Schools
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/SUSE/csrn/resources/small/

Top 5 websites with links to research on small schools
Looking for research on small schools? These five websites are great places to start:

  • ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools
    These short "digests" are probably the best quick overview of the of the research on small schools.
  • Small Schools Workshop
    This site provides a more comprehensive overview of the research on small schools, including links to recent studies.
  • National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities
    This is another comprehensive list of links to studies and articles on small schools, including some of the most recent research.
  • Small Schools Project
    This is a shorter (and thus more manageable) list, which includes some of the key studies on small schools.
  • Coalition of Essential Schools Fieldbook
    This is another shorter list of resources which includes some key studies, including some articles by the Coalition not cited elsewhere.

The Research in Brief:
ERIC digests and other research summaries

These studies provide an excellent overview of the of the research on small schools:

New Small Learning Communities: Findings From Recent Literature
http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed425049.html by Kathleen Cotton (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 2001).
This is a clear, comprehensive overview of the recent research on small schools and small learning communities, with a primary focus on studies completed in the past five years.

Small Schools: The Numbers Tell a Story
http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed414615.html by Michael Klonsky (Small Schools Workshop, 1998).
This article provides an excellent overview of the research data on small schools, including some older studies that are not referenced in many other publications.

Current Literature on Small Schools
http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed425049.html by Mary Anne Raywid (ERIC Digest, 1999).
This digest provides a brief overview of research literature on the effectiveness of small schools and describes current topics researchers have begun to explore.

Affective and Social Benefits of Small-Scale Schooling
http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed401088.html http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/nslc.pdf by Kathleen Cotton (ERIC Digest, 1996).
This digest is a brief version of a longer paper called "School Size, School Climate, and Student Performance," (School Improvement Research Series Close Up #20, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 1996). Both publications provide an excellent overview of small schools research, including in particular the affective and social benefits of small schools.

School Size
http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed414615.html by Karen Irmsher (ERIC Digest, 1997).
This digest is another good overview of small schools research, including information on cost-effectiveness, facilities, and whether there is an optimal school size.

Research About School Size and School Performance in Impoverished Communities
http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed448968.html by Craig Howley, Marty Strange, and Robert Bickel (ERIC Digest, 2000).
This digest reviews the findings of the Matthew Project, a multi-state study that replicated findings showing that small schools significantly reduce the achievement gap between low-income and wealthier students.

Curriculum Adequacy and Quality in High Schools Enrolling Fewer Than 400 Pupils (9-12)
http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed401090.html by Christopher Roellke (ERIC Digest, 1996).
This digest reviews research showing that small school size facilitates the development of a high-quality curriculum.

ASK ERIC Internet Sites:

Youth at the Crossroads: Facing High School and Beyond (Winter 2001)
http://www.edtrust.org/main/documents/k16_winter01.pdf
This report provides an overview of available data on student achievement and school completion, and ends "with a look at some core building blocks for rethinking high school education". This report was published by the Education Trust, Inc and is available as a pdf document.

Transforming the American High School: New Directions for State and Local Policy (2001)
http://www.jff.org/pdfs%20and%20downloads/transforminghs.pdf
This report identifies "systemic policy issues and change strategies necessary to respond to this emerging crisis?on a large scale and in the fastest possible time frame" Published by Jobs for the Future's From the Margins to the Mainstream Initiative and the Aspen Institute's Program on Education in a Changing Society.

High Schools That Work
http://www.sreb.org/programs/hstw/hstwindex.asp
High Schools That Work offers a framework of goals and key practices that more than 1,000 schools in 23 states are implementing to raise student achievement. Site includes publications and materials that can be downloaded for immediate use.

The New American High Schools Initiative
http://www.ed.gov/offices/OVAE/HS/index.html
This is an initiative of the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Vocational and Adult Education. It focuses on high schools that are committed to providing challenging academic standards for their students, standards that will adequately prepare them for higher education and careers.

High Schools of the Millenium
http://www.aypf.org/publicatons/HSchools_round_3.pdf
This report "examines the crisis of America's outdated high schools as they try to handle the changing needs of today's youth." Published by the American Youth Policy Forum and is available as a pdf document.

State Graduation Requirements
http://education.umn.edu/nceo/TopicAreas/Graduation/StatesGrad.htm
This site includes links to state web sites with information on graduation requirements.

Initiation Rites in American High Schools: A National Survey (August 2000)
http://www.alfred.edu/news/html/hazing_study.html
This report, by Nadine C. Hoover, Ph.D. and Norman J. Pollard, Ed.D. of Alfred University, examines the presence of hazing and initiation rites for high school students.

1994 Bibliography on School Restructuring
http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/educatrs/leadrshp/leon-toc.htm
This bibliography provides a recommended list of research and theoretical literature in school restructuring. The literature, chosen to be of interest for practitioners, policymakers, and researchers, is organized into five areas:

I. General References on School Restructuring
II. Student Experiences
III. Professional Life of the Teachers
IV. School Governance
V. Collaboration Between Schools and Community

These topics reflect specific research projects conducted at the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.

Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Wisconsin Center for Education Research
1025 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI 53706
(608) 263-7575

[top]