In the Spotlight The Knowledge Loom Home Page About Search Feedback Site Map Partners
The Knowledge Loom - Professional DevelopmentSpotlight cover page

Spotlight Cover

List of Practices

about this practice
Current page

What is it?

Stories

Research

Policy

Related Resources

Join the dialog submenus

Panel Discussion

Have Your Say

Q & A

Download/Print

Entire Spotlight

This Practice

Selections


About Printing

Log in
Register

National Staff Development Council (NSDC)

Model Professional Development Awards Program

National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching (NPEAT)

Co-nect, Inc.




THE PRACTICE: Professional development should incorporate evaluation of multiple sources of information on (a) outcomes for students and (b) the instruction and other processes that are involved in implementing the lessons learned.


Content Presented By:
National Partnership for Excellence & Accountability in Teaching content provider logo

What is it?

When done right, evaluation of professional development yields important lessons for refining professional development. Without such evaluation, future opportunities for teachers to learn may not be productive. Multiple sources of information should be used, including teacher portfolios, observations of teachers, peer evaluations, and student performance. Lessons become most clear when evaluators collect data during different stages of the change process.

Questions to Think About

  • When teachers commit to the change process, what evidence of the effect on students are they most interested in?
  • What are some effective ways to judge the effect of professional development on adult learners during professional development, in classroom practice and in the long-term? What is the effect on student achievement?
  • What professional development evaluation strategies can be used to inform further professional development with the same teachers in the future? With other teachers?
  • How can informal, ongoing, and workplace-based professional development be evaluated to encourage further professional development?